Report 2023-133 Recommendations
When an audit is completed and a report is issued, auditees must provide the State Auditor with information regarding their progress in implementing recommendations from our reports at three intervals from the release of the report: 60 days, six months, and one year. Additionally, Senate Bill 1452 (Chapter 452, Statutes of 2006), requires auditees who have not implemented recommendations after one year, to report to us and to the Legislature why they have not implemented them or to state when they intend to implement them. Below, is a listing of each recommendation the State Auditor made in the report referenced and a link to the most recent response from the auditee addressing their progress in implementing the recommendation and the State Auditor's assessment of auditee's response based on our review of the supporting documentation.
Recommendations in Report 2023-133: City of Anaheim: It Has Not Properly Managed Tourism-Related Contracts and Millions of Dollars in Related Funds (Release Date: January 2024)
| Recommendations to Anaheim, City of | ||
|---|---|---|
| Number | Recommendation | Status |
| 1 | To ensure better oversight of tourism district assessment funds, the Anaheim city council should by July 2024 designate an advisory board to make recommendations regarding how such funds should be spent. The advisory board should include, at a minimum, some of the owners of the assessed entities within the tourism district, legal counsel, and a person knowledgeable in government finance. |
|
| 2 | To ensure better stewardship of public funds, Anaheim should by January 2025 develop a contract management, monitoring, and oversight process that aligns with the practices set forth in the corresponding provisions of the State Contracting Manual. Specifically, the city should implement policies and procedures for its professional services contracts that require it to track contract deadlines, deliverables, and contractors' use of funds, and it should perform periodic compliance audits and reviews of contractors' financial records. |
|
| 3 | To improve Anaheim's oversight of the tourism district assessment contract with Visit Anaheim, the city should by January 2025 seek to renegotiate with Visit Anaheim to revise the contract to ensure that the contract does the following: -Includes key performance indicators to allow the city to better gauge how effectively Visit Anaheim is using tourism district assessment funds. These benchmarks should include, at a minimum, hotel occupancy rates, convention center bookings, and the number of presentations made to convention center executives. |
|
| 4 | To improve Anaheim's oversight of the tourism district assessment contract with Visit Anaheim, the city should by January 2025 seek to renegotiate with Visit Anaheim to revise the contract to ensure that the contract does the following: -Requires that Visit Anaheim separately track all expenditures related to the contract and prohibits Visits Anaheim from comingling tourism district assessment funds with other revenue sources. |
|
| 5 | To improve Anaheim's oversight of the tourism district assessment contract with Visit Anaheim, the city should by January 2025 seek to renegotiate with Visit Anaheim to revise the contract to ensure that the contract does the following: -Requires Visit Anaheim to annually report to the city the amount of any unspent tourism district assessment funds and tourism district assessment fund reserve balances. |
|
| 6 | To improve Anaheim's oversight of the tourism district assessment contract with Visit Anaheim, the city should by January 2025 seek to renegotiate with Visit Anaheim to revise the contract to ensure that the contract does the following: -Prohibits Visit Anaheim from transferring tourism district assessment funds to another entity without the city's prior approval and full compliance with the subcontracting provisions of the tourism district assessment contract. |
|
| 7 | To improve Anaheim's oversight of the tourism district assessment contract with Visit Anaheim, the city should by January 2025 seek to renegotiate with Visit Anaheim to revise the contract to ensure that the contract does the following: -Requires Visit Anaheim to develop a plan for oversight of any subcontractor and provide documentation of this oversight annually to the city. |
|
| 8 | To ensure that the city of Anaheim receives adequate consideration for all of its professional services contracts, the city should implement contract monitoring practices sufficient to ensure that it receives all of the deliverables agreed to in any contract's scope of work. Further, the city should assess whether it received adequate consideration for the 2019 economic development contract or the 2020 shop-and-dine-local contract; if the city finds that it did not receive adequate consideration, then the city should explore its restitution mechanisms under contract law to obtain a return of those funds. |
|