Report 2017-302 Recommendation 5 Responses

Report 2017-302: Judicial Council of California: It Needs to Follow Competitive Bidding Processes More Consistently and Establish Clear Guidance for Invoice Processing (Release Date: December 2017)

Recommendation #5 To: Judicial Council of California

To prevent misinterpretation of policies governing its procurement practices, the Judicial Council should reissue its local manual by June 2018, incorporating all updates made since the 2011 version of the manual.

6-Month Agency Response

The Judicial Council's local procurement manual (local manual) primarily defines the level of management at which a procurement, based on its dollar value, must be approved. The Judicial Council's staff agree that the local manual needs to be consolidated into a unified document in order to avoid confusion. However, with the Judicial Council and the Courts of Appeal transitioning to Fi$Cal - which includes a procurement module - staff have been focused on system configuration and staff training. Once Fi$Cal has been successfully implemented, the Judicial Council's procurement process and approval controls will be similar to those of other state agencies that also use Fi$Cal.

  • Estimated Completion Date: December 2018
  • Response Date: June 2018

California State Auditor's Assessment of 6-Month Status: Pending

60-Day Agency Response

Staff from the Judicial Council's Branch Accounting and Procurement (BAP) unit are in the process of consolidating and updating its local contracting manual per the audit's recommendation.

  • Estimated Completion Date: June 2018
  • Response Date: February 2018

California State Auditor's Assessment of 60-Day Status: Pending

All Recommendations in 2017-302

Agency responses received are posted verbatim.