Report 2016-036 Recommendation 1 Responses

Report 2016-036: Indian Gaming Special Distribution Fund: The Method Used to Mitigate Casino Impacts Has Changed, and Two Counties' Benefit Committees Did Not Ensure Compliance With State Law When Awarding Grants (Release Date: March 2017)

Recommendation #1 To: Fresno, County of

If the Legislature appropriates funding from the distribution fund for mitigation grants in the future, to comply with state law, the benefit committee for Fresno County should ensure that it obtains sufficient documentation from grant applicants to demonstrate that the requested funding represents the correct proportionate share of the costs attributable to casino impacts.

Annual Follow-Up Agency Response From November 2022

As of today, there has been no indication that the Legislature will appropriate funding from the distribution fund for mitigation grants. Should the legislature appropriate funding in the future, the recommendation will be followed.

California State Auditor's Assessment of Annual Follow-Up Status: Not Currently Feasible

The Legislature has not appropriated any funding for mitigation grants since we issued our report in March 2017.


Annual Follow-Up Agency Response From November 2022

As of today, there has been no indication that the Legislature will appropriate funding from the distribution fund for mitigation grants. Should the legislature appropriate funding in the future, the recommendation will be followed.

California State Auditor's Assessment of Annual Follow-Up Status: Not Currently Feasible

The Legislature has not appropriated any funding for mitigation grants since we issued our report in March 2017.


Annual Follow-Up Agency Response From October 2019

The recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be implemented in the future, if the Legislature appropriates funding from the distribution fund for mitigation grants in the future. As of today, there has been no indication that the Legislature will appropriate funding from the distribution fund for mitigation grants.

California State Auditor's Assessment of Annual Follow-Up Status: Not Currently Feasible

The Legislature has not appropriated any funding for mitigation grants since we issued our report in March 2017.


Annual Follow-Up Agency Response From October 2018

The recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be implemented in the future, if the Legislature appropriates funding from the distribution fund for mitigation grants in the future. As of today, there has been no indication that the Legislature will appropriate funding from the distribution fund for mitigation grants.

California State Auditor's Assessment of Annual Follow-Up Status: Not Currently Feasible

The Legislature has not appropriated any funding for mitigation grants since we issued our report in March 2017.


1-Year Agency Response

The recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be implemented in the future, if the Legislature appropriates funding from the distribution fund for mitigation grants in the future. As of today, there has been no indication that the Legislature will appropriate funding from the distribution fund for mitigation grants.

California State Auditor's Assessment of 1-Year Status: Not Currently Feasible

The Legislature has not appropriated any funding for mitigation grants since we issued our report in March 2017.


6-Month Agency Response

The recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be implemented in the future, if the Legislature appropriates funding from the distribution fund for mitigation grants in the future.

California State Auditor's Assessment of 6-Month Status: Not Currently Feasible

The Legislature has not appropriated any funding for mitigation grants since we issued our report in March 2017.


All Recommendations in 2016-036

Agency responses received are posted verbatim.